<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Putnam County - EdTribune FL - Florida Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Putnam County. Data-driven education journalism for Florida. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://fl.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Same Size, Different Worlds: Putnam and Walton Counties Have a 33-Point Absenteeism Gap</title><link>https://fl.edtribune.com/fl/2026-05-14-fl-putnam-walton-gap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fl.edtribune.com/fl/2026-05-14-fl-putnam-walton-gap/</guid><description>Putnam County and Walton County are both rural Florida districts with enrollment in the 10,000-to-13,000 range. Both sit outside major metro areas. Both have schools named after local landmarks and Fr...</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/fl/districts/putnam&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Putnam County&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/fl/districts/walton&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Walton County&lt;/a&gt; are both rural Florida districts with enrollment in the 10,000-to-13,000 range. Both sit outside major metro areas. Both have schools named after local landmarks and Friday night football games that draw the whole community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their chronic absenteeism rates are far apart. Putnam&apos;s is 57.5%. Walton&apos;s is 24.3%. The gap between them, 33.2 percentage points, is wider than the entire pre-COVID chronic rate for the state of Florida.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part of the &lt;a href=&quot;/fl&quot;&gt;Florida Chronic Absenteeism&lt;/a&gt; series.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A gap that doubled&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-14-fl-putnam-walton-gap-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Putnam vs. Walton trend&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2018-19, the gap was already substantial: 18.5 points, with Putnam at 39.2% and Walton at 20.7%. The pandemic blew it wide open. Putnam&apos;s rate surged to 53.5% in 2020-21 and kept climbing to 57.5% in 2023-24. Walton&apos;s rose more modestly, hitting 27.2% in 2021-22 before pulling back to 24.3%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result is a gap that has nearly doubled from 18.5 to 33.2 points. In Putnam, more than half the student body is chronically absent. In Walton, three-quarters of students attend school regularly. Both counties are governed by the same state laws, receive funding through the same FEFP formula, and answer to the same Department of Education.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The obvious explanation is poverty. Putnam County, located in inland North Central Florida, has a poverty rate roughly double the state average. Walton County, anchored by the coastal tourism economy of Destin and 30A, has a more affluent economic base. But poverty alone does not produce a 33-point gap, particularly when both districts had chronic rates in the 20-39% range five years ago. The divergence since COVID suggests that the pandemic hit Putnam&apos;s already-fragile support systems in ways that Walton&apos;s more robust community infrastructure withstood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The other pair: Lake and Collier&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-14-fl-putnam-walton-gap-lake-collier.png&quot; alt=&quot;Lake vs. Collier trend&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar story plays out in larger districts. &lt;a href=&quot;/fl/districts/lake&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Lake County&lt;/a&gt; (51,345 students, 37.7% chronic) and &lt;a href=&quot;/fl/districts/collier&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Collier County&lt;/a&gt; (51,833 students, 17.4% chronic) have nearly identical enrollment but a 20.3 percentage-point gap in chronic absenteeism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap was 11.3 points in 2018. By 2024 it had nearly doubled. Collier peaked at 24.3% during the COVID surge and recovered to 17.4% — within striking distance of its pre-pandemic 11.9%. Lake peaked at 36.8% and has stayed there, even worsening slightly to 37.7%. Two districts the same size, on opposite attendance trajectories.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Widening, not narrowing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-14-fl-putnam-walton-gap-widening.png&quot; alt=&quot;Gap trends&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both paired comparisons show the same pattern: gaps that were already significant before COVID have roughly doubled since. The pandemic did not create Florida&apos;s attendance disparities, but it widened them sharply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The widening raises hard questions about the state&apos;s approach to attendance. Florida&apos;s school accountability system primarily tracks test scores and school grades. A district like Walton, where students mostly show up, and a district like Putnam, where most do not, receive the same general framework for improvement: attendance letters, truancy referrals, counseling services. That framework was built for a world of modest variation between districts, not for 33-point gaps between neighbors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What makes Collier and Walton different from Lake and Putnam? The data alone cannot answer that question. Florida&apos;s chronic absenteeism reporting includes no demographic subgroups, no attendance band detail, and no breakdown by school type. The patterns suggest that whatever is working in the lower-absence districts, whether community engagement models, family support infrastructure, school culture, or simply a wealthier tax base, is not transferring to the districts where it is most needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Putnam County, Walton County, Lake County, and Collier County did not respond to requests for comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>Putnam County: From 63.6% to 91.2% — Florida&apos;s Most Dramatic Graduation Turnaround</title><link>https://fl.edtribune.com/fl/2026-05-01-fl-putnam-transformation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fl.edtribune.com/fl/2026-05-01-fl-putnam-transformation/</guid><description>Putnam County was the second-worst-performing district in Florida in 2016. Just 63.6 percent of its seniors graduated, a full 17 percentage points below the state average. Eight years later, Putnam gr...</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/fl/districts/putnam&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Putnam County&lt;/a&gt; was the second-worst-performing district in Florida in 2016. Just 63.6 percent of its seniors graduated, a full 17 percentage points below the state average. Eight years later, Putnam graduates 91.2 percent of its students, 1.5 points above that same state average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 27.6 percentage-point improvement is the largest of any Florida county district with a cohort above 500 students. It is, by the numbers, one of the most dramatic graduation turnarounds of any district in any state we have analyzed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The climb, year by year&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-01-fl-putnam-transformation-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Putnam vs state graduation rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Putnam&apos;s trajectory began with an astonishing 8.6-point jump from 63.6 to 72.2 percent between 2016 and 2017. The following year brought another enormous gain, a 12.6-point leap to 84.8 percent. In the space of two years, Putnam had vaulted from failing to functional.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gains continued more modestly from there: 1.5 points in 2019, then a 3.8-point boost in 2020 that pushed the rate above 90 percent for the first time. The COVID waiver year of 2021 saw a 92.5 percent mark, Putnam&apos;s highest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-01-fl-putnam-transformation-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Year-over-year changes&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When assessment requirements returned in 2022, Putnam&apos;s rate dropped 4.0 points to 88.5 percent. But this correction was less severe than the state&apos;s 2.8-point drop would suggest for a district starting from a higher base. Putnam recovered quickly, posting 88.9 percent in 2023 and then 91.2 percent in 2024.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The critical point: Putnam&apos;s current 91.2 percent rate was achieved without assessment waivers and exceeds the state average. The turnaround has stuck.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Every subgroup improved&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most extraordinary number in Putnam&apos;s data is not the overall rate. It is what happened to students with disabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/fl/img/2026-05-01-fl-putnam-transformation-subgroups.png&quot; alt=&quot;Subgroup improvements&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Students with disabilities in Putnam graduated at 35.6 percent in 2016. In 2024, they graduated at 89.1 percent. That is a 53.5 percentage-point improvement, meaning Putnam went from graduating roughly one in three students with disabilities to nearly nine in ten.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Students who are economically disadvantaged followed a similar path, climbing 32.2 points from 56.9 to 89.1 percent. English learners reached 100 percent graduation in 2024, though the cohort size for that group in this small, rural district is small enough that individual students can shift the rate substantially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Male graduation rates improved by 28 points, from 59.1 to 87.1 percent. Female rates improved by 27.2 points, from 68.0 to 95.2 percent. By 2024, the gender gap in Putnam had narrowed to 8.1 points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A rural county, not a suburb&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Putnam County sits along the St. Johns River in North Central Florida, about an hour south of Jacksonville. The county seat is Palatka. The population is roughly 75,000. This is not a fast-growing suburban community with demographic tailwinds pushing numbers up. Putnam&apos;s graduating cohort actually shrank over this period, from 686 students in 2016 to 668 in 2024.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The improvement happened despite a smaller cohort, which makes it harder to dismiss as an artifact of changing demographics or selective enrollment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What the data cannot explain&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data show what happened but not how. A 27.6-point improvement in eight years, concentrated in the first two years and then sustained, suggests intentional intervention rather than natural drift. Districts that improve by 5 or 6 points typically get attention. Districts that improve by 28 points in a sustained way are genuinely rare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact that every subgroup participated in the improvement, and that students with disabilities improved by more than 50 points, points to systemic changes in how the district approaches graduation rather than targeted programs for specific populations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Putnam County did not respond to a request for comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>